Reconsidering the “Reckless Creation of Whiteness”: Blumenbach, the Caucasus, and the Real Origins of Europeans

The evil left wing rag MSN has again targeted Whiteness in an opinion article titled the “reckless creation of Whiteness” . The article critiques Johann Friedrich Blumenbach’s 18th-century formulation of a “Caucasian race,” portraying it as a pseudo-scientific construct with no grounding in reality. The article notes that Blumenbach’s On the Natural Varieties of Mankind (1795) relied on Biblical dispersal myths, aesthetic judgments about Circassian beauty, and travelers’ accounts rather than empirical data (Blumenbach 222–24). This “Caucasian” ideal, the article clams was later exploited by pro-slavery ideologues and racial theorists to construct a pan-European identity for political ends.

While this critique is partially valid, it overlooks a critical fact: modern archaeology and population genetics confirm that the very region Blumenbach identified—the Caucasus and adjacent Pontic Steppe—was indeed the cradle of the Proto-Indo-European population that constitutes the primary ancestral core of most Europeans. The problem with Blumenbach was not so much his geography as his reasoning. While, basically guessing based on the bible is rediculous, his geographic intuition coincidentally overlapped with the real epicenter of European origins, which the article fails to mention.

In the past decade, genomic studies have radically clarified the deep ancestry of Europeans. Ancient DNA research, most notably by Haak et al. (2015) and Allentoft et al. (2015), demonstrates that around 4,500–5,000 years ago, the Yamnaya culture emerged on the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, directly north of the Caucasus Mountains. This population is widely regarded as the most likely speaker of Proto-Indo-European, the ancestral language family of nearly all European tongues. Their genetic profile reveals a fusion of two major populations:

• Eastern European Hunter-Gatherers (EHG), originating in the northern steppe and forest zones.

• Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers (CHG), a population native to the southern Caucasus and closely related to Neolithic groups in Anatolia and Iran.

This fusion created a new, mobile, pastoralist society that introduced the domesticated horse, wheeled vehicles, and a warrior-elite culture across Europe, South Asia, and parts of the Near East (Haak et al. 208; Allentoft et al. 170). Genetic modeling indicates that Steppe-derived ancestry accounts for 50–75% of the genetic makeup of most Northern Europeans and 25–50% in most Southern Europeans today (Haak et al. 210).

Thus, while Blumenbach’s argument was based on myth, the Pontic-Caucasus nexus truly was the heartland of the ancestral population that defined the genetics and cultures of Europe.

Blumenbach’s idealization of Circassians—whom he described as the “most beautiful race of men” and therefore the “primeval” stock of humanity (Blumenbach 224)—was an aesthetic and theological leap, not a scientific conclusion.

However, dismissing all associations between Europeans and the Caucasus as a mere fantasy erases the genuine historical and genetic connection that predates Blumenbach by millennia. The Proto-Indo-European expansion, which shaped the languages, paternal lineages, and much of the autosomal DNA of modern Europeans, originated in the same geographic zone Blumenbach identified—though for reasons far removed from his biblical myths.

Understanding the distinction between Blumenbach’s pseudo-science and the real ancestral history of Europeans is crucial for two reasons. First, it prevents modern discourse from perpetuating a new myth—that “whiteness” or European peoplehood is entirely a cultural invention of the 18th century, divorced from any biological or historical reality. While the social meaning of “whiteness” in colonial and American contexts is indeed modern( as in the use of the specific term “White” as a shorthand way to refer to Europeans), the common peoplehood of Europeans, rooted in the Yamnaya-CHG synthesis of the Caucasus-Steppe, is far older.

Second, it reminds us that correcting historical misuse of science does not require denying facts. Blumenbach’s framework deserved to be discarded because it was based on aesthetics and Biblical speculation, not because Europeans lack deep, shared origins.

The MSN article is right to critique Blumenbach’s “Caucasian race” as a pseudo-scientific construct. But it errs by implying that the association of Europeans with the Caucasus is purely mythical. Modern genetic and archaeological research shows that the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, enriched by ancestry from the Caucasus, was the cradle of the Proto-Indo-European peoples who became the primary ancestors of Europe.

The idea of “white” may be modern, but the biological and cultural cohesion of Europeans, and its connection to that region, is not. To conflate Blumenbach’s errors with the dismissal of this continuity is to replace one myth with another. Europeans are not a random assortment of peoples bound solely by later ideology. They share a substantial genetic core, rooted in the Yamnaya/Proto-Indo-European population of the Pontic Steppe, whose own ancestry traces to the Caucasus and they themselves dwelled in the foothills of the Northern Caucasus.

Acknowledging this does not endorse Blumenbach’s reliance on the bible in place of real science. It simply corrects the record: the formation of Europeans as a biological and cultural bloc predates colonialism and Blumenbach’s theorizing by millennia. To suggest otherwise — as if “whiteness” were conjured from thin air in the 18th century — is as misleading as Blumenbach’s own Biblical embellishments.

---

Works Cited

• Allentoft, Morten E., et al. “Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia.” Nature, vol. 522, 2015, pp. 167–172.

• Blumenbach, Johann Friedrich. On the Natural Varieties of Mankind. 1795. Edited and translated by Thomas Bendyshe, London: Anthropological Society, 1865.

• Haak, Wolfgang, et al. “Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe.” Nature, vol. 522, 2015, pp. 207–211.

• Painter, Nell Irvin. The History of White People. W. W. Norton, 2010.